Thursday, January 11, 2018

Plato's Republic Book 1

Well folks, I have finished Book1 of Plato's Republic and - to be frank - thus far I am with Friedrich Nietzsche in Twilight of the Idols:
Before Socrates, argumentative conversation was repudiated in good society: it was considered bad manners, compromising. The young were warned against it. Furthermore, any presentation of one's motives was distrusted. Honest things, like honest men, do not have to explain themselves so openly. What must first be proved is worth little. Wherever authority still forms part of good bearing, where one does not give reasons but commands, the logician is a kind of buffoon: one laughs at him, one does not take him seriously. Socrates was the buffoon who got himself taken seriously: what really happened there?
Post a Comment